Yup, it's a firestorm. Yup, it's getting pretty ugly.
Nope, I don't want to get too involved except to say a thing or two and leave a couple links.
First off, those who have been with me, like, forever, know that back in the day when Driscoll was ranting and raving and raping The Song of Songs mostly unchallenged, I appreciated MacArthur's voice in the wilderness, calling Driscoll on his misused and abuse of Scripture.
I still appreciate what he has done.
But now, John MacArthur is ranting and raving and shooting off his mouth and pen with his book and conference called Strange Fire attacking Charismatics.
And apparently Driscoll crashed MacArthur's party.
My biggest impulse is to back up and let the elephants trample each other while I figure out how to serve God to the best of my ability in my small corner of the world far and away from these mad men. And I think that is just what I'll do.
But first I'll link a few things here of those taking on MacArthur's unchristian, unfriendly fire.
Wenatchee the Hatchet has a lot to say about some of this stuff (this is just a link to his blog, not any one post because he has several today).
Wade Burleson does a wonderful job addressing this in his usual level headed manner.
And Wartburg Watch, as always, will keep us updated.
So, for those of you who care to pursue this, I've linked these to get you started.
Oh that God would deliver us from the curse of celebrity pastors.
(Edited November 22, 2013 to add a link from WTH concerning the Open Letter to Mark Driscoll I mentioned in the comments below.)
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Monday, October 21, 2013
Logical Fallacies
When I have time, I debate things with others on the internet.
I've learned a lot on how to do it and how not to do it.
I still have a lot to learn.
But one thing I've found out...
There are a lot of people who don't know how to argue/debate without logical fallacies.
So I've linked a list of them I found on imgur (I go there to laugh at funny cat pictures and videos.).
Your logical fallacy is...
I've learned a lot on how to do it and how not to do it.
I still have a lot to learn.
But one thing I've found out...
There are a lot of people who don't know how to argue/debate without logical fallacies.
So I've linked a list of them I found on imgur (I go there to laugh at funny cat pictures and videos.).
Your logical fallacy is...
Friday, October 18, 2013
Thursday, October 17, 2013
Plagiarism or Not... THIS!
Wenatchee the Hatchet left a comment under one of my previous Mars Hill plagiarism posts.
Since it had been a while since I put up those posts, people interested n the topic might miss his comment and I don't want them to.
Wenatchee the Hatchet:
What I find troublesome about Grace Driscoll's appropriation of Dan Allender's terms and concepts is not simply that she never gives him any credit, it's that during 2011 when the Driscoll book was in its run-up for promotional touring Mars Hill Graduate School changed its name to remove "Mars Hill". 2011 was also the same year that cease and desist letter got sent out. It cumulatively raises the question of whether or not Mars Hill leadership isn't a bit more cavalier about the intellectual property of other people than it wishes to be about its own content. I find the Mars Hill double standard about the sadness of others copying Mars Hill material while not acknowledging Grace Driscoll's clearly testified debt to the work of Dan Allender puzzling. All it would have taken was a single footnote or endnote, after all.
There doesn't just seem to be a double standard. There clearly is a double standard. If the Driscoll's want to freely borrow from others, then they shouldn't be so ugly towards others who appear to may have borrowed from them.
Since it had been a while since I put up those posts, people interested n the topic might miss his comment and I don't want them to.
Wenatchee the Hatchet:
What I find troublesome about Grace Driscoll's appropriation of Dan Allender's terms and concepts is not simply that she never gives him any credit, it's that during 2011 when the Driscoll book was in its run-up for promotional touring Mars Hill Graduate School changed its name to remove "Mars Hill". 2011 was also the same year that cease and desist letter got sent out. It cumulatively raises the question of whether or not Mars Hill leadership isn't a bit more cavalier about the intellectual property of other people than it wishes to be about its own content. I find the Mars Hill double standard about the sadness of others copying Mars Hill material while not acknowledging Grace Driscoll's clearly testified debt to the work of Dan Allender puzzling. All it would have taken was a single footnote or endnote, after all.
There doesn't just seem to be a double standard. There clearly is a double standard. If the Driscoll's want to freely borrow from others, then they shouldn't be so ugly towards others who appear to may have borrowed from them.
Thursday, October 3, 2013
Plagerism. Too Strong of a Word?
Apparantly it was in comparing Grace Driscoll's writing to someone else's writing.
My friends over at Equality Central Alliance reeled me in.
Here was our conversation.
Good News/Bad News
My friends over at Equality Central Alliance reeled me in.
Here was our conversation.
Good News/Bad News
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Real Plagiarism in "Real Marriage"?
Speaking of "Real Porn" er... I mean "Real Marriage"...
It appears that portions of what Grace wrote were actually from another book that is not given credit.
The portions under question have nothing to do with the porn in other sections but is actual helpful info for the wounded soul. At least they were helpful to Grace.
Because those portions are helpful and because I'm so concerned about the wounded heart, part of me is glad to see evidence of her receiving healing some how from somewhere.
But, as WTH points out, plagiarism it plagiarism and I'm disappointed that the actual helpful parts of this book fall under this category.
Real Marriage Chapter 7, Part 2: Comparing Grace Driscoll's writing to Don Adler's writing from the Wounded Heart
Looks like Don Adler's "Wounded Heart" might be a good read. Like I said, I have a great concern for the inner healing of all the members of the Body of Christ.
It appears that portions of what Grace wrote were actually from another book that is not given credit.
The portions under question have nothing to do with the porn in other sections but is actual helpful info for the wounded soul. At least they were helpful to Grace.
Because those portions are helpful and because I'm so concerned about the wounded heart, part of me is glad to see evidence of her receiving healing some how from somewhere.
But, as WTH points out, plagiarism it plagiarism and I'm disappointed that the actual helpful parts of this book fall under this category.
Real Marriage Chapter 7, Part 2: Comparing Grace Driscoll's writing to Don Adler's writing from the Wounded Heart
Looks like Don Adler's "Wounded Heart" might be a good read. Like I said, I have a great concern for the inner healing of all the members of the Body of Christ.
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
What Is Traumatizing a Generation?
I'm sure many of you have seen this around.
I have seen it linked, but it was in places I couldn't link to until now.
So since EE has done the hard work, I'll just link to her post.
Oh, yeah.
What is traumatizing a generation?
Porn, my friend.
As bad as it is in the church with pushers like Mark Driscoll around (co-author of Real Porn er... I mean Real Marriage), it truly is worse in other places.
Pornography Is Sexually Traumatizing an Entire Generation
I have seen it linked, but it was in places I couldn't link to until now.
So since EE has done the hard work, I'll just link to her post.
Oh, yeah.
What is traumatizing a generation?
Porn, my friend.
As bad as it is in the church with pushers like Mark Driscoll around (co-author of Real Porn er... I mean Real Marriage), it truly is worse in other places.
Pornography Is Sexually Traumatizing an Entire Generation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)